I'd agree Larry, but I attended a presentation where it was stated that some
dyslexic people might not qualify. I think the assumption was that reading
and writing substantial amounts of text are not part of daily life or else
that the disadvantage would be trival not substantial..
Are there any DDA cases relevant to this?
ATB
Claire
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Arnold [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 25 May 2004 06:15
To: Claire Wickham;
Subject: RE: SENDA and UK HE[Scanned]
Really what century do you inhabit?
Is not reading and writing a daily task since the advent of general literacy
and universal schooling ?
Larry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The Disability-Research Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Claire Wickham
> Sent: 24 May 2004 22:43
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: SENDA and UK HE[Scanned]
>
>
> Chris et al,
>
> Your selection of a dyslexic student as your example raised an interesting
> issue for me. As I understand it, a dyslexic student might find
> it difficult
> to prove that they were included within the DDA definition of a disabled
> person as they might have no difficulties in carrying out daily tasks.
> (Although they may be disabled in HE if no adjustments are made).
> Has there
> been clarification of this point?
>
> And just to open this up to the rest of the world: does disability
> legislation ion other countries include dyslexic people within the
> definition of "disabled"?
>
> ATB
>
> Claire
>
________________End of message______________________
Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
|