On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, David Berry wrote:
> One of the things that AST brags about is that it is pure "ansi C".
> So really the best solution would probably be for me to do away altogether
> with the isnan calls, by doing more checks before performing the
> calculations that potentially produce the nans which are being checked
> for.
>
> Any comments from you CVSers?
no objections here.
--
Mark Taylor Starlink Programmer Physics, Bristol University, UK
[log in to unmask] +44-117-928-8776 http://www.star.bris.ac.uk/~mbt/
|