Tim and all,
On Friday, March 5, 2004, at 11:17 PM, Tim Jenness wrote:
> Thanks - looks good. I think I was a bit unclear in what I was saying
> though since it strikes me that the starconf section (2.1) appears
> without
> any context and is then followed by the description of the autotools
> that
> provides the context for starconf (ie I think talking about the
> starconf
> without having any idea how conf systems work in general and then
> following up with a description of configure is backwards)
A good point. I've swapped the sections round, and tidied up wording
elsewhere.
Revision 1.3 is now at
<http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/star/ssn78/> (by the way, the
Abstract section includes the $Id$ keyword).
Now for CCDPACK....
Norman
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Norman Gray http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/
Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow [log in to unmask]
|