> Wow. Starlink should publish more refereed papers! [has someone collated
We're too busy writing software to write refereed papers. (-: We have
long needed some blue-sky allocation to research algorithms and
techniques, unfettered by immediate demands. When I first raised this
many years ago, certain people thought I meant I wanted more
astronomical research time. Writing KAPPA involved largely
bread-and-butter applications; some research element into image
processing or statistical techniques which could be applied to astronomy
would have been a stimulating change, and would have led to many novel
features in our software.
Did you have anything in mind Tim?
IDI gave a bad name to international co-operation. It took much effort
to bring about, then hardly anyone used it.
> all the Starlink ADS publications? They should go on the web site (I did a
> JAC equivalent: http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/JACpublic/JAC/software/pubs.html ]
Trouble with such lists, you have to maintain them.
Don't papers like the L'M standards paper (2003MNRAS.345..144L) with
Sandy, TimH, Andy, Uncle Tom Kerr and al. count? I was an author
because of the ORAC-DR reductions used, and the description of those.
There was also the UKIRT seeing paper Seigar et al. 2002SPIE.4844..366S,
which used ORAC-DR FWHM measurements.
Malcolm
|