Hello Nell
Over the years some gems of conversation, all therapy based, have emerged
from what appears to be socializing and banter.
You will remember that Winnicott allowed for chaos before any constructive
therapeutic work could begin. I often find the discussions on the list as
forerunner to some pretty in depth stuff, sometimes not, but what does it
matter so long as the group stays alive.
I have never heard of you before, but the banter brought you to the fore and
I hope that you don't leave.
Kindest
Gerald
-----Original Message-----
From: Nell Bridges <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 24 March 2004 14:27
Subject: Re: 'energetic sharing'
>Hi,
>
>I'm now wondering if I have missed a requirement for membership to this
>list and whether I should leave. I have only posted once or twice (when
>I have had something to say). I joined to keep up with info and
>developments in the field rather than for chat. Although I am very keen
>on my computer I have no wish for it to provide for a significant part
>of my social life.
>
>Have I missed a groundrule? Who decides on how active members should
>be? Any suggestions?
>
>Nell
>
>
>Quoting Pamela Harper <[log in to unmask]>:
>
>> List members
>>
>> I don't mind passive as long as it is not total passiveness to a
>> point where
>> other list members like myself don't know you exist. Now some of you
>> have made
>> the effort do not disappear into total oblivion again and it is not
>> too late
>> for you other lurkers to shake off the cobwebs and emerge
>>
>> Pamela and power
>>
>
>
|