I support Mark. It is possible, practical and desireable to have robust
debate. However this can be done very satisfactory by addressing the issues,
not attacking the man (or woman or person)
rgds John
----- Original Message -----
From: "keith armstrong" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: housekeeping
> A sad persons responce.
>
>
> Keith
> on Mon, 15 Mar 2004 05:46:53 -0500 , Shelley Lynn Tremain
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >This sort of supposedly-neutral administrative post is a very effective
way
> >of delegitimizing criticism of the behaviour of those in power whom one
> >wants to protect from these challenges.
> >
> >S.L .Tremain
>
> --
> War makes people ill.
>
>
> ___________________________________________________
> Web-based office space for rent. Free trial!
>
> http://www.officemaster.net
>
> ________________End of message______________________
>
> Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
> are now located at:
>
> www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
>
> You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
>
________________End of message______________________
Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
|