Apologies for the cross-posting. Thought some of you interested in
Records Classification might be interested in the following note.
Best Wishes,
Paul.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tamara Puli [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 12 February 2004 11:41 AM
To: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Records Classification Discussion Paper - We want your feedback
IT21-09, a Standards Australia sub-committee, has released a discussion
paper about issues in records management classification. The committee
is seeking your feedback in relation to the paper in order to assist
them to reach an informed position and provide guidance on these issues.
The period for comment is open until Friday 30th April 2004.
In particular, this paper WILL be of interest to Records Managers,
Records and Document Management software vendors, Records Management
Regulatory bodies and Records Management consultants.
This paper MAY be of interest to Information Managers and Knowledge
Managers (particularly those who use business classification as an
internal
language), Information Technology professionals (particularly those who
are involved in implementing Electronic Document Management systems or
those who base directory structures on business classification), and
Librarians (particularly those who are carrying out information
audits)."
This paper can be viewed via:
1. The RMAA web site:
http://www.rmaa.com.au/docs/branches/nat/pub/index.cfm
2. The ASA web site:
http://www.archivists.org.au/whatsnew.html
Questions or comments should be sent to:
[log in to unmask]
Thank you and we look forward to your feedback.
Tamara Puli
Records and Archives Services
Monash University, Clayton
Vic 3800
|