> This sounds reasonable to me.
>
> The 'con' is that everyone is going to be confused because it
> would be using dc:description slightly differently from how
> it is being used at present by everyone.
Yes. Though when I read the small print about dc:description a couple of
months back and discovered it could even provide "a reference to a
graphical representation... of the content", then I felt that using it
to refer to a catalogue or a metadata record was quite within scope.
Pete
|