On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 19:20, Roland Schwaenzl wrote:
> Thomas wrote
> >
> > Thank you for raising this, Pete. This is essentially what
> > I was trying to get at in an earlier posting:
> >
> > On October 17, Thomas Baker wrote:
> > > A careful reader might wonder, with regard to to Figure 6 in
> > > Appendix B, whether the following is intended:
> > >
> > > [resource URI] --dc:identifier--> [value URI] --rdfs:label--> "[resource URI]"
> > >
> > > ...where the URIs at both ends are identical.
>
>
> A value of a dc:identifier is by definition "an unambiguous reference to the
> resource in the given context."
>
> A [value URI] IS a resource URI. The linguistic distinction between resource URI's and value
> URI's is an illusion.
Correct, and I think this could be made explicit in the AM.
His example is still correct, I think.
/Mikael
--
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
The more things change, the more they stay the same
|