On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 22:26:03 +0000, Andy Powell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I'm pleased to announce a new draft of the DCMI Abstract Model
>
> http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/abstract-model/
>
>This version builds on the work presented and discussed during the
>meetings in Seattle. It includes a more formalised representation of the
>model in the form of two UML class diagrams and two additional appendicies
>(C and D) that discuss the relationship between the abstract model and the
>DCMI recommended guidelines for encoding DC in XML and XHTML.
Would it be correct to interpret the Abstract Model as allowing a structure
along the following lines (abusing Relax NG Compact to show an example):
element metadata {
element dc:title { text="journal article" },
element dcterms:isPartOf {
element dc:title { text = "journal title" }
}
}
Bill
|