Replying out of interest only. I'm assuming the teat requires an intact hair bulb ouch!!!!. I can see why blood tests are not used - infection concerned society and all that, but isn't hair testing as invasive in it's way. What are the advantages over saliva and urine tests, apart from perhaps the avoidance of artefact and tampering?
Regards,
Mary.
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Darcy [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 28 April 2004 14:23
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Drug testing
Professor John Henry from St Mary's hospital has written many articles
about drugs, some of which I believe mentions testing. I do not have
any references to hand although I think a search on the BMJ website may
throw some up for you.
Out of interest, do any of the list work anywhere that uses hair
testing? We have a contract with an American company that insists on
random hair tests for all employees and contractors (including us).
Regards
Paul
Paul D'Arcy,
Occupational Health Manager (Acting)
Occupational Health
Hammersmith Hospital
Developing And Supporting People To Make Healthcare Better
Direct Line 020 8383 1024
Internal Ext 31024
*
**
Confidentiality Notice
The contents of this e-mail are confidential to the ordinary user of the e-mail address to which it is addressed and may also be privileged. If you are not the addressee of this e-mail you may not copy, forward, disclose or otherwise use it in any form whatsoever. If you have received this e-mail in error please telephone the Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust IT department on 020 8746 5555. Please also delete the message from your computer.
**
*
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please remove this footer before replying.
Visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html for list archives
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please remove this footer before replying.
Visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html for list archives
|