JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH Archives

OCC-HEALTH Archives


OCC-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH Home

OCC-HEALTH  2004

OCC-HEALTH 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: TREATMENT SERVICE from Kaaren

From:

"Harrop, Chris" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Occupational Health mailing list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:23:05 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (176 lines)

Dear Elaine

I must say, despite being a reasonably young nurse in Occ Health, but of 8
years experience and with prevention as a main aim, I agree with Margaret in
that there is a definite benefit to a treatment service, providing it is
managed well.   The guidelines as clearly stated in Securing Health Together
(HSE 2000/1) and subsequently Taking a Public Health Approach (2003), we
must reduce sickness absence.   In my experience Margaret is quite correct
in saying employees who are used to having an hour lie down if genuinely
unwell and then going back to work once better (if they are fit to do so) is
better than them going home.   In these circumstances you are most likely to
have the ones who get cross and just leave or the tuffies, who stay at work
but become a safety risk as ill health may cause lack of attention.   So
treatment in these cases are, in my mind, prevention.   Prevention of a
worse scenario.

I too agree with the empowerment of first aiders, but not to the extent that
the nurse is unavailable should further medical attention be required as
this then may prevent unnecessary hospital referrals when the first aider
would need back up.

Furthermore providing it is coupled with good preventative health screenings
and proactive health promotion I have, by listening to employees who come
for paracetamol found in fact in many cases their trouble is not simply the
headache.   There is often another issue, such as work related stress,
working conditions, stress at home, sickness in the family, or in some cases
severe illness that the GP ignored but we knew the employee better and could
put a case forward for them as we new they were not usually the malingering
type.    By referral up to Occ Health Doctor they were referred back to the
GP and successful diagnosis of a serious illness was made for which the
employee now receives treatment.   So again in this case prevention of
death.

On a final note although I can understand your desire to change the 'old
fashioned approach' I found it sad to hear your undertoned comments.  The
Company must have been happy with the nurse to have employed her/him for so
long.   Whilst I support underpinning practice with the best possible
research based evidence,  I have no doubts in my mind that a good Enrolled
Nurse with 20 years Occ Health experience (who may also have some evidence
for what she does - we don't know) would be preferable, to a young
inexperienced, Degree Registered Nurse with no knowledge of the Company in
which she works as there is evidence to suggest it is essential to 'know
your company'.   Keeping on that note, it is said in a number of health
promotion books including one by Ewles and Simnett (1999) it is better not
to try to change the internal politics in these situations but to learn it
and work around it.

So in summary, I agree a compromise would be sensible, with a good sound
knowledge of the company, to avoid conflict and anarchy in the ranks.   A
gentle shift towards prevention with introduction to how to help yourself,
health promotion including work related things, but also when to ask OH and
when to see the GP etc etc.  and some health screenings etc and work place
monitoring, but with the employees knowing they are still cared for, may be
the way forwards.

Regards

Kaaren



-----Original Message-----
From: Reddoch, Margaret [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 29 January 2004 13:21
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: TREATMENT SERVICE


Dear Elaine

What about suggesting compromises? If the staff are used to this 'nursing'
service, they are not only going to miss it if it is discontinued at a
stroke, but are likely to feel resentful which could be counterproductive to
overall OccHealth service. What's wrong with having a rest room where women
with dysmen. can lie down with or without a hot water bottle? the OH nurse
doesn't necessarily have to minister to them, or even be around.Ditto people
with migraine, post epileptic fit etc etc.most of these people will go back
to work after half an hour or so whereas otherwise they would more than
likely have gone home. I've found giving people a chance to discuss their
general health concerns reaps benefits both in their view of the overall OH
service and in keeping them productive at work and it doesn't have to take
up much time. A paracetamol machine will solve most peoples OTC medication
needs. I agree about empowering first aiders

Allthe best
Margaret



 From: Elaine Dobson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 29 January 2004 11:37
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: TREATMENT SERVICE



Dear All



I have prepared a presentation for a company who has asked for an assessment
and recommendations for the future of their OH service.  I am happy with it
so far but would like some more "ammunition" as to why the present treatment
service should be discontinued.



Current service

SEN who has been in post for 20 years and is retiring - wears uniform!

Rest room with two hospital beds, she gives hot water bottles to women with
dysmenorrhoea!

Not surprisingly I was shown a cupboard full of OTC medicines!



I was hoping to be able to quote some legislation as to why the OHN should
not be administering OTC medication to back up my arguments. None of this
medication is specifically related to hazards on site. It appears that if
the Dr is willing to produce a standing order for this stuff then why
shouldn't the OHN continue to administer it.  I can not find any evidence to
back up my recommendation to remove this service.



I have covered cost effectiveness in use Of OH time

Safety issues keeping people at work who are ill and who work on production
line

Promoted pro active rather than reactive service

Empowerment of First Aiders as she still sticks the plasters on



This is a good time to reshape the service.  Your comments would be
appreciated.



Many thanks



Elaine









~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Please remove this footer before replying. Visit
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html for list archives



"This transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for the
addressee. It may contain information which is covered by legal,
professional or other privilege. If you are not the intended addressee, you
must not disclose, copy or take any action in reliance on this transmission.
If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us as soon as
possible."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Please remove this footer before replying. Visit
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html for list archives

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please remove this footer before replying.
Visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/occ-health.html for list archives

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager