I agree with Dan that there are really 2 separate issues here: (1) when
and how we pay (2) how much we pay.
It would be good if these two could be taken separately - is it really
too late?
Christine
Christine Reid
NHS Staff Library, Education Centre
Seacroft Hospital
York Road, Leeds LS14 6UH
Phone (0113) 2063675
Fax (0113) 2063325
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Please visit our website at www.leedsth.nhs.uk
>>> [log in to unmask] 26 October 2004 13:46:55 >>>
Given that moving to rolling subscriptions is, I suspect, not remotely
controversial, I find it odd that the two motions we are to
be asked to consider are "all or nothing". Too late now, I guess, but
was the option of keeping banding but moving to rolling
renewal dates considered? (Is there anything theoretically impossible
about running banded subscriptions on a rolling basis and
asking members to notify CILIP of changes to their bands?).
I feel stitched up, to be honest.
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chartered Library and Information Professionals
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tim Buckley Owen
> Sent: 25 October 2004 11:37
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: CILIP AGM- subs
>
>
> Dear LIS-CILIP members,
>
snip
>
>
> Option 2 was prepared by the Honorary Treasurer in advance of
> the AGM as a contingency measure to ensure adequate
> membership income for CILIP in 2005 in the event of Option 1
> being rejected. It proposes a continuation of the existing
> income-related system with a 3% inflation increase on current
> subscription levels.
|