I agree with Diana.  But in my opinion, I believe that CILIP does have a
certain role in the ID card debate.  Chris Armstrong's excellent Ex
Cathedra in eLucidate, to which he referred in his original email,
demonstrates that this debate is not just about politics.  It is
fundamentally about information, and as some of us are *information*
professionals (as opposed to librarians) and as CILIP is the professional
association in the UK representing information professionals, so CILIP
ought to enable a forum to discuss these information issues.

Of course there are other associations like the BCS which have members with
valid professional opinions, but as this is a debate about information, so
information professionals have a responsibility to discuss the matter.
Legal and social and political experts have their own forums if they
believe there is an issue for them.

Chris's article also mentioned the information connection with DNA
sampling.  This is another information issue - not *only* a political or
social or policing issue - on which those of us who are information
professionals could express professional opinions.

In my Ethically Speaking column in Information World Review (backpage,
April 2001) I commented: "One prominent information professional recently
failed to convince me that we should not get involved in the current debate
on the handling of human genetic information.  Of course we must involve
ourselves, if not individually at least as a profession.  The latest
consultation period by the UK's Human Genetics Commission ... ended in
February.  Each of the nine main chapters in its discussion document ...
discussed practical and ethical issues in obtaining confidential personal
information, ownership of such information, use, re-use and storage of that
information, and a wide range of related topics which should have been at
the very least of some professional curiosity to most of us.  How can we
distinguish between genetic information and almost any other type of
information: business, financial, government?  It is an arrogant - or
blinkered - information professional who happily hands over responsibility
for such matters to the medicolegal profession.  And yet neither of the two
main professional organisations in the UK (the LA or the IIS) made any
representation to the HGC."

In other words, CILIP and its members do have a role in this debate.  It is
about information.  Some of us are information professionals.  Those of us
who are not do not need to take part in the debate.







Diana Nutting <[log in to unmask]>@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> on 19/05/2004
13:34:47

Please respond to Chartered Library and Information Professionals
       <[log in to unmask]>

Sent by:    Chartered Library and Information Professionals
       <[log in to unmask]>


To:    [log in to unmask]
cc:
Subject:    Re: ID Cards, the National Identity Register and Data
       Protection


Doesn't everyone seem to be rather missing the point of this. It's not to
vent steam on one's personal political stance (in some cases quite
offensively) but to explore CILIP's role in the ID card debate. Personally
I
don't think it has a role, but I'm open to persuasion.


Diana Nutting
Information Liaison Manager
Business Link for London
Link House
292-308 Southbury Road
Enfield EN1 1TS
> *  020 8443 7229
> * [log in to unmask]
www.businesslink4london.com





--
Create a winning website - find out how
 Visit http://www.businesslink4london.com to find out more.


 ============================================================
 Jonathan Gordon-Till, FCLIP, Research Department, Aon Limited
 21 Peterborough Road,Harrow,Middlesex,HA1 2AJ
 Tel:+44 20 8864 9966,Fax:+44 20 8422 0760
 Direct:+44 20 8970 4448 or 4477,Mobile:+44 7941 700 879

 Internet:[log in to unmask]
 Website :http://www.aon.com/

 Aon - Insure Your Vision
 ============================================================


 Disclosure of Material Facts
 Every Proposer or Insured / Reinsured when seeking new insurance /
 reinsurance or renewing an existing Policy must disclose any information
 which might influence the Insurer / Reinsurer in deciding whether or not
 to accept the risk, what the terms should be, or what premiums to charge.
 Failure to do so may render the insurance / reinsurance voidable from
 inception and enable the Insurer / Reinsurer to repudiate liability.

 This email, together with any attachments, is for the exclusive and
 confidential use of the addressee(s) and may contain legally privileged
 information.  Any other distribution, use or reproduction without the
 sender's prior consent is unauthorised and strictly prohibited.  If you
 have received this message in error, please notify the sender by email
 immediately and delete the message from your computer without making any
 copies.  While attachments are virus checked, Aon Limited does not accept
 any liability in respect of any virus which is not detected.

 Aon Limited
 Company Number: 210725
 Registered Address: 8 Devonshire Square, London, EC2M 4PL

 Aon Limited is a member of the General Insurance Standards Council
 (registration 2239)