JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-PROFESSION Archives


LIS-PROFESSION Archives

LIS-PROFESSION Archives


LIS-PROFESSION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-PROFESSION Home

LIS-PROFESSION Home

LIS-PROFESSION  2004

LIS-PROFESSION 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Future of Aslib

From:

"C.Oppenheim" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Chartered Library and Information Professionals <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:36:35 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (125 lines)

I agree with Ian;  perhaps the only thing worth having is the goodwill
associated with the name Aslib, and I suspect it's value is not that great
any more.

Charles

Professor Charles Oppenheim
Department of Information Science
Loughborough University
Loughborough
Leics LE11 3TU

Tel 01509-223065
Fax 01509-223053
e mail [log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Johnson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: Future of Aslib


The real issue is whether any prospective buyer would operate Aslib as a
pure commercial entity like Tfpl, or try to continue as membership based
association.  Aslib has masqueraded as a professional association for a
long time, but there is little obvious evidence that it has represented
the corporate bodies' interests in any significant and useful way in
recent years.  As  a commercial entity, it has been 'selling off the
family silver' for years, and has nothing left to sell other than its
name and the business record of its training and consultancy activities,
both of which have an unpredictable potential.  What they are worth is
therefore debatable, and I'm not sure that I would want CILIP to invest
in purchasing them rather than developing its own activities in the same
fields.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chartered Library and Information Professionals
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of JACKIE FISHLEIGH
Sent: 15 December 2004 10:00
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Future of Aslib


I was amazed that a UK library membership group could go under as a
direct result of the consequences of 9/11. Charles Oppenheim's
explanation makes far more sense to me. I think we should be honest
about the difficulties faced by Aslib because if these are not properly
resolved what future can there be.

Jackie Fishleigh
Librarian
Payne Hicks Beach
10 New Square
Lincoln's Inn
WC2A 3QG

-----Original Message-----
From: Chartered Library and Information Professionals
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Crawford, John
Sent: 15 December 2004 09:49
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Future of Aslib



        -----Original Message-----
        From: Chartered Library and Information Professionals on behalf
of Alan Pritchard
        Sent: Wed 15/12/2004 08:50
        To: [log in to unmask]
        Cc:
        Subject: Re: Future of Aslib



        > I wonder whether CILIP would consider this an opportunity to
discuss
        > with Aslib the possible merger of the two organisations. There
is almost
        > complete overlap in subject interests, and it would seem
better to have
        > one strong organisation representing both individual and
corporate
        > members of the profession.
        >
        > Besides, a joint organisation might then end up with a library
again!
        >

        I found that very sad. I did a summer work placement at Belgrave
Square
        when I was a student. Spent a lot of time reading old journals
(ProcBSIB,
        JDoc etc) But before I fully go into 'boring old fart
reminiscing' mode, I
        do have a more substantial point.

        I just wonder if a single organisation consisting of both
personal and
        corporate members could actually work. Other than just having a
few of the
        latter as supporting members. There are enough conflicts of
interests with
        differing segments of personal members, but I could see much
more
        fundamental conflict between, say, the LA acting as the
professional
        regulator of special librarians and attempting to represent the
interests
        of the corporate employers of those librarians.

        I may be out of date, but I am not aware of any major
organisations which
        operate on this model. BCS, IEE, IoD - personal members. CBI etc
-
        corporate members.

        Best wishes
        Alan Pritchard
        The GLOBAL GAZETTEER(tm): the world on file
        http://www.allm-geodata.com
        Tel: +44 (0) 1202 417 477

        NOTE my new email address: [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager