JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-CILIP-REG Archives


LIS-CILIP-REG Archives

LIS-CILIP-REG Archives


LIS-CILIP-REG@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-CILIP-REG Home

LIS-CILIP-REG Home

LIS-CILIP-REG  2004

LIS-CILIP-REG 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

looking for a clerical job ?

From:

"E.S. Rees" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

E.S. Rees

Date:

Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:10:03 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (159 lines)

The following is cross-posted with permission from the AUT "poster" - while 
not all issues will be relevant to you, this is how the land lies in HE - 
while some librarians live in blissful ignorance of their rights (preferring 
to stay at clerical status) this soon will not be negotiable.

Perhaps CILIP should do sth about this (which of course they refuse to do, 
in a serious "we mean business" way).

So in future, you will be very chartered and very clerical (well, your mum 
will be pleased at least - look, mum, I've chartered ! I'm finally on 18k !)

.............................................................

Dear colleague,


Why a vote for industrial action is necessary

The employers’ offer means:



*         A reduction in career earnings for many lecturers, researchers and
academic related staff

*         Smaller annual increments and longer scales which will hit both
existing staff and new starters

*         Unregulated local job evaluation, leading to pay based on where
you work NOT what you do and to post downgradings for many

*         Accepting the right of any institution to set its own pay
structure and the end of a national career structure

*         The removal of academic related staff from academic pay structures

*         No catch-up payment to make up ground lost over the last two
decades



It is a massive attack on your existing pay and conditions.  To find out 
about the impact on your earnings go to 
http://www.aut.org.uk/media/docs/factsheet4_theimpactonearn.rtf
<http://www.aut.org.uk/media/docs/factsheet4_theimpactonearn.rtf> .  Pre-92 
staff can see the earnings spreadsheets at 
http://www.aut.org.uk/media/pdf/careerearningsdata.pdf
<http://www.aut.org.uk/media/pdf/careerearningsdata.pdf> , or for a more 
“fun” take on earnings can go to UCL AUT’s brilliant salary cutulater at 
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/unions/AUT/npf/cutulater.htm
<http://www.ucl.ac.uk/unions/AUT/npf/cutulater.htm>



To read a comprehensive summary of the employers’ proposals get a copy of 
our briefing at http://www.aut.org.uk/media/pdf/payfuturebriefing.pdf
<http://www.aut.org.uk/media/pdf/payfuturebriefing.pdf> .



Students support your fight to defend pay and conditions

Following discussions between AUT general secretary Sally Hunt and Mandy 
Telford of the National Union of Students (NUS), Mandy has given full 
backing on behalf of students to AUT’s fight to defend pay and conditions. 
Mandy says



“The NUS recognise that industrial action may be necessary by AUT to protect 
their members’ interests.  Further, NUS supports the AUT in their struggle 
against the employers’ attacks on academic and related staff’s pay and 
conditions. NUS urges the employers to return to the negotiating table to 
resolve AUT’s issues now in order to protect and ensure the high quality 
delivery of education for current and future students.”



You can read the full joint AUT/NUS statement at 
http://www.aut.org.uk/media/pdf/aut_nus_jointstatement.pdf
<http://www.aut.org.uk/media/pdf/aut_nus_jointstatement.pdf>



Is Nottingham the future for all staff?

Be warned!  Nottingham University has imposed a UCEA style pay framework on 
AUT members.  The university claims it is acting in accordance with the 
principles behind the employers’ national offer (i.e. we can do what we 
like, when we like). The new structure would mean that new lecturers would 
lose £12,135 over the first thirteen years of their careers compared to 
existing terms and conditions and has introduced performance related pay 
even beyond what the national employers want.  Nottingham AUT has called a 
strike ballot.



Employers economical with truth again

In the Times Higher this week, the employers are YET AGAIN peddling the line 
that this dispute is only about the position of academic related staff. They 
are doing this because they want to con academics into believing that their 
proposals will not affect them.  The reality is that while the academic 
related link is important both to the unity of our profession and to AUT’s 
ability to represent all members effectively, the real issue behind the 
dispute is the proposed pay structure which would lead to reductions in 
career earnings for both academic staff and academic related grades.



Even if the employers conceded ground on the position of academic related 
staff how could we accept a pay offer which reduces pay for many staff?  You 
can read about the employers’ other little attempts at deception at 
http://www.aut.org.uk/media/docs/factsheet5_tenhalftruthsfr.rtf
<http://www.aut.org.uk/media/docs/factsheet5_tenhalftruthsfr.rtf> .



Are the employers prepared to negotiate?

In December the employers finally agreed to talk to AUT about the proposed 
pay structures.  A few hours later, they changed their minds and withdrew 
the offer.  With no hope of further discussions, this forced AUT into a 
dispute we have spent six months trying to avoid.  NATFHE, who provided 
strong support to AUT at the negotiations, described the employers’ actions 
at December's meeting as follows:



“A little progress was made yesterday, but much less than could have been 
achieved had the employers not retracted the offer made to AUT regarding 
academic related staff and increments for staff on the old universities. The 
employers’ action is very disappointing and unhelpful.”



You can read the full text of our sister union NATFHE’s position at 
http://www.natfhe.org.uk/says/rels2003/2003pr93.shtml
<http://www.natfhe.org.uk/says/rels2003/2003pr93.shtml>



Help us to win

Now, with the employers digging their heals in, we have to deliver an 
overwhelming vote in favour of industrial action.  Only a strong mandate 
from members will bring them back to the negotiating table.  If you care 
about your pay and conditions, get involved in the campaign by contacting 
your local association.  Ask them for a pay poster to put on your door. 
Offer to hand out leaflets.  Tell colleagues about the stand your union is 
taking and persuade them to join and have their say.  Non-members can 
download an application form at 
http://www.aut.org.uk/media/pdf/aut_application_0304.pdf
<http://www.aut.org.uk/media/pdf/aut_application_0304.pdf> .

_________________________________________________________________
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
October 2021
September 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager