I know what you mean about what they might do to your electronic version at the other end. I fear they may print it out in which
case presentation might suffer slightly :(
I think I'm going to present mine as web pages, so the question of different programmes should be less of a problem, ie as long as
I can make it look good in an internet browser then it should look reasonably similar at the other end.
Lx
----------------------
Laura Tassoni
Information Adviser
Learning Centre (Adsetts)
x4700
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: list for CILIP members working towards MCLIP status [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Cheney Gardner
Sent: 23 July 2004 16:08
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Friday question
I had the report part spiral bound in office world which was cheap. It was double spaced as I definitely read somewhere that it
had to be. The portfolio was assembled in pockets in a ring binder but when I had established how many I needed I just bought one
of the floppy binders with a certain number of pockets glued in it. I posted 3 copies of this and it cost about £13 by recorded
delivery.
I have just been accepted so I assume what I did was ok!
I decided not to subit electronically as I found it impossible to assemble a portfolio in so many different formats that way. I
was also worried that they would open it in a different version and my neat (slaved over) formatting would go everywhere.
Don't know if this helps
Cheney
Cheney Gardner
Team Librarian
Bracknell Library, Town Square, Bracknell, RG12 1BH
01344 352416
[log in to unmask]
>>> "Innes, Claire" <[log in to unmask]> 07/23/04 03:59pm >>>
I am considering submitting electronically, because I don't fancy spending a small fortune to post all that paper - plus, think of
the trees! I admit that I haven't looked hard, but there doesn't seem to be any guidance in the new regs about what electronic
format they require or whether any non-proprietary format would do. Anyone know? I suppose I should just phone and ask!
Claire
Claire Innes
Information Manager
Group Technology / Strategy, Architecture and Design
The Royal Bank of Scotland
* +44 131 523 2551
* [log in to unmask]
* http://www.rbs.co.uk
* 113 Dundas Street, Edinburgh, EH3 5EB, UK
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tassoni, Laura [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 3:40 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Friday question
>
> *** WARNING : This message originates from the Internet ***
>
> I haven't been able to find a reference to line spacing in the 2002
regs,
> maybe they don't mind anymore...
>
> If it doesn't say in the regs that pages should be removeable then I
would
> think spiral binding would be ok, but if you're unsure perhaps you
> could ring them and ask.
>
> I'd use spiral binding if it were me, but I've decided to submit it
> electronically, urgle, is anybody else doing it this way?
>
> Laura
> ----------------------
> Laura Tassoni
> Information Adviser
> Learning Centre
> Sheffield Hallam University
> 0114 225 4700
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: list for CILIP members working towards MCLIP status
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Gareth Ryan
> Sent: 23 July 2004 15:31
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Friday question
>
>
> Page 22 of the 95 regs says reports must in double spacing.
>
> One thing I'm wondering about is the type of binding I should use. I
note
> that pages should be "firmly attached" I know some
> people have submitted using spiral binding but I seem to recall at
some
> chartership event that an indication was given that the
> pages in reports should be removeable to allow assessors to cross
check
> between apendices and different sections. Has anyone any further
> information on appropriate binding?
>
> thanks
>
> Gareth Ryan
> Assistant Librarian
> Law Library
> University of Strathclyde
> Stenhouse Building
> 173 Cathedral Street
> Glasgow
> G4 0RQ
>
> 0141 548 3293
> [log in to unmask]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: list for CILIP members working towards MCLIP status
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Melanie
> Brocklehurst
> Sent: 23 July 2004 14:59
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Friday question
>
> On the verge of finishing my report (hurray) and wondered if anyone
could
> answer this simple question. Have I dreamt it, or did I really read
> somewhere that the report should be typed
"double-spaced"? I
> can't find it
> in the handbook. I know the report needs to be minimum 12 point to
> comply
> with DDA guidelines.
>
> I'm sure this has been asked before, but it's a hot Friday
afternoon.
>
> Many thanks
> Melanie
>
> Melanie Brocklehurst
> Senior Information Adviser - Health & Social Care
> Learning and Information Services
> London South Bank University
> 250 Southwark Bridge Road
> London SE1 6NJ
>
> Tel: 020 7815 6695
> E-mail: [log in to unmask]
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Registered in Scotland No. 90312.
Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc is authorised and regulated by the
Financial Services Authority and represents The Royal Bank of Scotland
Marketing Group. The Bank sells life policies, collective investment
schemes and pension products and advises only on the Marketing Group's
range of these products and on a With-Profit Bond produced by Norwich
Union Life (RBS) Limited.
This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only.
If the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please
return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the
message from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure.
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility for
changes made to this message after it was sent.
Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the
onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments
will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is
accepted by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc in this regard and the
recipient should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers
appropriate.
**********************************************************************************
This e-mail may be
read by employees of the Council and is therefore not to be considered private by the recipient. The views expressed in this
e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily the views or opinions of Bracknell Forest Borough Council.
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
which they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the system manager. Email:
[log in to unmask]
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail has been swept by MailSweeper for the presence of computer viruses. Although the
Council has taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and any attachments are virus free we advise that in keeping with good ICT
practice the recipients should confirm this for themselves.
**********************************************************************
|