So,
A site with the CE and SE nodes at LCG-2_2_0 and the WNs at LCG-2_3_0, what information should publish for dataGridVersion or RuntimeEnvironment vars?
LCG-2_3_0, ie the one at the WNs?
cheers,
Gonzalo
Maarten Litmaath, CERN wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Javier Fontan wrote:
>
>
>>I'm the manager of egee.cesga.es site (CESGA-EGEE) and I'm planning the
>>installation of LCG 2.3.0. The problem I have is that our configuration
>>is a bit exotic as we managed to merge CE, SE, UI, WN and MON nodes in a
>>single LCFGng profile and we installed this services on just one node.
>>We also have extra WN's installed equally using LCFGng but using
>>standard profiles. I've been reading that now LCG 2.3.0 makes a site
>>with multiple OS versions (RH73 & SL3) in different machines feasible
>>but I wonder if can coexist a CE, SE, UI, MON with LCG 2.2.0 and RH73
>>and WN's with LCG 2.3.0 and SL3. If this question receives a positive
>
>
> Yes, they can coexist.
>
>
>>answer I'll update my WN's to LCG 2.3.0 and SL3 using manual
>>installation and leave the CE, SE, UI and MON node as it is now. I'm
>>doing this beacuse merging again profiles for the new version would be
>>lots of work and will take loads of time. I'm also planning the
>
>
> I do not think the profiles of 2.2.0 and 2.3.0 are very different;
> you could compare the profiles for each of CE/SE/UI/WN and only apply
> the differences to your combined profile.
>
>
>>separation of this services in various machines but this will make me
>>reinstall the machines and bringing down the whole site.
>>
>>Thank you and happy holidays.
>
>
> Best wishes for 2005.
--
Gonzalo Merino ([log in to unmask])
Port d'Informació Científica, PIC
Edifici-D, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona) SPAIN
Tel: +34 93 5813322 / Fax: +34 93 5814110
|