Hi Chris,
I have just checked and your site is perfect!
Notification will be sent in the usual way after the test have been run.
Laurence
Brew, CAJ (Chris) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since you don't list the succeeding/failing sites in your e-mail, have you
> notified the sites with problems that they have them.
>
> I hope RALPP is not one of them, R-GMA seems to be ok from our (limited)
> tests, but if you don't tell us about problems they won't get fixed!
>
> Yours,
> Chris.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: LHC Computer Grid - Rollout
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Henry Nebrensky
> > Sent: 08 October 2004 00:23
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] RGMA problem all over the grid ?
> >
> >
> > This evening's survey: out of 26 sites in the lxn1188.cern.ch
> > RB that have
> > resources that match ("R-GMA" OR "RGMA") AND LCG-2_2_0 and allow CMS
> > jobs, only 13 successfully transferred monitoring information
> > from a user
> > job via R-GMA back to Brunel. Jobs to three sites (LIP, CGG, FZK) were
> > aborted with errors along the lines of "Job got an error while in the
> > CondorG queue", the rest having problems with either R-GMA
> > configuration
> > or operation. So if you got a snooty e-mail from me, you're
> > in good(?) company.
> >
> > Careful analysis reveals that only 3 of the 11 jobs sent to resources
> > beginning with letters 'c' through 'e' succeeded, but I must
> > confess to
> > not understanding the significance of this!
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Henry
> >
> > --
> > Dr. Henry Nebrensky [log in to unmask]
> > http://www.brunel.ac.uk/~eesrjjn
> > "The opossum is a very sophisticated animal.
> > It doesn't even get up until 5 or 6 p.m."
> >
>
|