Hi Fay

So where is the money in this new contract. We are 4 months in, and I don't
see it yet.

**
The best deal that they could get
**

There is shortage of doctors, the D.o.H. could have been stretched over a
barrel by any decent hard headed negotiators. That's the problem isn't it.

Richard


----- Original Message -----
From: "Fay Wilson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: The Future of GP Computing


> It is my constant refrain.
>
> I don't think those who voted yes believed they were grovelling. They
wanted
> the OOH opt out, a practice based contract and the thought they would get
> more money and they balanced the disadvantages against that. The GPC
members
> who voted to go ahead didn't believe they were grovelling but that they
were
> representing their constituents and this was the best deal they could get.
> --
> Fay
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Johnson" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 2:49 PM
> Subject: Re: The Future of GP Computing
>
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Perhaps Fay would tell that to the GPC negotiators, I don't think they
got
> > the message. Neither did the 70% for voted for this abject surrender. I
> was
> > one of the 30%
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bill Westwood" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 11:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: The Future of GP Computing
> >
> >
> > > Don't grovel, be assertive! If we are assertive there will be no need
to
> > > grovel!
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: GP-UK [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Richard Johnson
> > > Sent: 27 August 2004 21:11
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Subject: Re: The Future of GP Computing
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Well done that daughter. For god's sake don't let her do medicine. She
> is
> > > worth far more than grovelling to our political masters
> > >
> > >
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Trefor Roscoe" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 12:07 AM
> > > Subject: Re: The Future of GP Computing
> > >
> > >
> > > > Julian Bradley wrote:
> > > > > At 14:42 26/08/2004, you wrote:
> > > > >> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ------=_NextPart_000_05E1_01C48B7A.DB4E76C0
> > > > >> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> > > > >>         boundary="----=_NextPart_001_05E2_01C48B7A.DB4E76C0"
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> ------=_NextPart_001_05E2_01C48B7A.DB4E76C0
> > > > >> Content-Type: text/plain;
> > > > >>         charset="US-ASCII"
> > > > >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Manpreet,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I have forwarded your letter to the GPC list for information
> > > > >
> > > > > Trefor,
> > > > >
> > > > > 243K for this seemed a little excessive.  Broadband is great but
> > > > > we're not all on terrabyte lines ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Julian
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Whoops!
> > > >
> > > > Din't mean to do this.
> > > >
> > > > Get yer own back thius weekend when I wil be on a doidgy mobile
> > > > connection thru my paalm at centre parcs.
> > > >
> > > > I may be a little incoherent at times as my daughter got 10 A* at
GCSE
> > > > today :-)
> >
> >