JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


GP-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

GP-UK  2004

GP-UK 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: auctioning GMS - check this out - pasted article

From:

Roger Gardiner <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

GP-UK <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:00:56 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (58 lines)

 
 
Core GP services open to commercial firms  


Primary care trusts are advertising for commercial firms to run core GP services under Department of Health plans to open up the primary care market.
A new alternative provider medical services (APMS) contract has been devised so that PCTs can encourage competition for primary care services. 

HSJ understands that PCTs have been told by the DoH that they must consider using APMS if they expect practices to struggle to meet GP access times.
Privately run groups of GPs have already begun to run core services under existing personal medical services contracts. But until now there has been no scheme which allows major companies to provide these kinds of services.

The Department of Health and NHS Confederation have established a ‘stakeholder forum’ to discuss the future of APMS, which includes major private sector players such as Pfizer and Mercury Health, 15 PCTs, voluntary sector organisations and other bodies like the British Medical Association. The forum expects to produce an interim report on the future of APMS next month, but PCTs are not waiting for that to be published.


City and Hackney teaching PCT is among those that have decided to advertise all future gaps in services to the private sector under APMS, as well as to NHS providers such as existing GP practices. Its director of primary care and community services Steve Gilvin said APMS would ‘add a fourth option to the way we can provide services to our patients’.

He admitted that his PCT would be unable to provide sufficient capacity without using the private sector. And he said he suspected his PCT was not alone.
Mr Gilvin said his PCT was ‘yet to test the market’, and he suspected that the private sector’s capacity to provide these services was currently limited. But he said his PCT’s professional executive committee had been consulted over its decision and reluctantly agreed that it was a necessary step: ‘Many of our local GPs feel very anxious about the involvement of the private sector. It’s not just competition; they genuinely worry about continuity of care.’

Nottingham City PCT is also considering using the private sector under APMS to help meet patient access guarantees, as well as replacing a slew of retiring 
single-handed GPs. 

A spokeswoman said the PCT would need the backing of its PEC, but that it was watching developments in APMS closely. 

ChilversMcCrea Healthcare was the first private firm to run GP practices under PMS contracts after it initiated talks with the DoH 18 months ago. It now runs practices in Essex, east London, and Brighton. Chair Dr Rory McCrea said he expected a ‘push’ from the DoH for PCTs to use APMS.He said that this could offer his firm the chance to consider floating on the stock exchange to raise investment funds. This would only be allowed under APMS. 
He said many PCTs were planning to advertise to fill gaps in GP services under APMS contracts because it would ‘bring the best of corporate structure to what is effectively a cottage industry’.

He said he viewed APMS as a solution for PCTs when PMS or general medical services could not provide the answer, but he believed it would not mean the ‘privatisation of general practice’.

Dr McCrea, who is also PEC chair for Epping Forest PCT, said his organisation would ensure that clinical requirements, not contractual structures, were the driving force for primary care provision. 

Commons health select committee chair David Hinchliffe said he would be ‘uneasy’ with any increased use of the private sector to provide primary care which he said was a ‘short-term fix’, that should instead be solved by providing more NHS GPs.

A spokeswoman for the British Medical Association commented that she did not expect the use of APMS to ‘open the floodgates’ for private provision, but she said the BMA would ‘keep a close eye’ on the situation to ensure that any growth in the market for private provision did not ‘erode the ethos of general practice today’. 





APMS: the fourth way


There are now four ways that primary care trusts can provide primary care services on their patch: general medical services; personal medical services; primary care trust medical services; and alternative provider medical services.

Guidance for PCTs when setting up APMS contracts, advises them to consider:


service specifications, which could include links to the GMS quality and outcomes framework;

price, which will be negotiated solely between the PCT and provider;
that the PCT must negotiate a method for performance monitoring of contracts;

that APMS contracts must stipulate what sanctions, including termination of the contract, may be imposed. 
 


Roger 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
June 2022
October 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager