Paul Caldwell wrote:
> Just read chisholms letter saying that the Doh may legislate to change
> rules so that a practice can include Goodwill in its assets for
> non-essential GMS under the NC. Presumably this means a rich practice in
> a salubrious area can demand extre buy-in money to the partners and
> especially out-going partner. I, like chisholm, am appalled.
It is simply an inevitable consequence of the contract. This is being
talked about for enhanced and additional services. These can be held by
companies who would not be covered by the 1948 legislation anyway. It
would be truly wierd if some supplies could sell goodwill and others
could not.
What it allow me to do is to set up, say, a minor surgery service for
the town and then sell it on as a going concern.
This is quite clearly a logical and sensible step. So of course Chiz
opposes it.
|