At 11:59 10-09-2004 -0400, A.D. wrote:
>I asked:
> > Are there other widely used compilers still not supporting long
> > names???
>I would like to repeat this question again so I do not have to search
>through endless documentations which rarely mention this in the first
>place: Which F95 compilers on IA32 and IA64 (Opteron and Intel) still
>do not support long names? I know NAG, Intel and Lahey all support at
>least 63 letters. Absoft apparently does not. How about PGI and
>Pathscale? Any compiler I am missing?
> Aleksandar
! Long-names.f95
integer :: abcdertyfjboigio_jvfvfiubhzxcvbnm_123 = 123
type alloc
real, allocatable, dimension(:) :: aa
end type
end
D:\Fortran\Test\NAS>nf95 -c long-names.f95
Compiling .\long-names.f95 ...
Reading D:\Fortran\Test\NAS\long-names.f95
Program prog-long-names:
"D:\Fortran\Test\NAS\long-names.f95" [2 c13]: Warning: Identifier exceeds
standard
length of 31 characters.
New program target "long-names" created for program unit
OK, Successfully compiled .\long-names.f95
N.A. Software Fortran accepts, with a warning, the long names.
BTW, also allocateble components. Don't know for all of the TR ...
And do you really need those long names ? :-)
\---
Best regards,
Jan van Oosterwijk | "They that can give up essential liberty
Netherlands | to obtain a little temporary safety deserve
| neither liberty nor safety."
| -- Benjamin Franklin (1759)
write(*,*)transfer((/778985834,1869504886,1702130543,1785296754 &
&,1635205227,1868849518,1819160175 /),(/'x'/)) ; end
mailto:Jan <dot> vanOosterwijk <at> wanadoo <dot> NL
http://huizen <dot> dto <dot> tudelft <dot> nl/vanOosterwijk/
|