Richard E Maine said:
> But allow me to point you to the NAG compiler's -dusty switch. If you have
Yes, that is the right solution.
> a fairly recent version of the compiler, -dusty allows the above
> equivalences. I think this was new to version 5.x.
No. It has been present for a long time.
> most compilers accept it - NAG's was probably in the minority in not
> having a way to accept it (until v5.x).
Actually, we accepted it in release 2.0b, back in 1993.
So we have had it for over a decade ...
Cheers,
--
...........................Malcolm Cohen, NAG Ltd., Oxford, U.K.
([log in to unmask])
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
|