JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Archives


COMP-FORTRAN-90@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90 Home

COMP-FORTRAN-90  2004

COMP-FORTRAN-90 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: IO buffer overflow

From:

Craig Dedo <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Fortran 90 List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:48:29 -0600

Content-Type:

multipart/mixed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (55 lines) , Craig_Dedo.vcf (15 lines)

Richard E Maine wrote:

> I make sure that my own outputs won't overflow buffers.  Yes, I'm aware
> that this is sometimes nontrivial. It is particularly nontrivial for
> things like list-directed and namelist output, where the compiler has
> many options and the user doesn't have any way of knowing what
> particular options the compiler uses. Fortunately for me, I've never
> used namelist internal output, and my uses of list-directed internal
> output are pretty simple.
>
> Note that list-directed and namelist internal I/O used to be
> disallowed. This is *NOT* a coincidence.  My understanding is that was
> exactly part of the reason, perhaps even the whole reason. But
> list-directed internal I/O is so widely useful that it later got added
> anyway in spite of this problem.  After all, in at least the simplest
> cases, it is easy for the user to provide buffers that are more than
> adequate for any eventuality... and it isn't an issue at all for input.


    Namelist I/O is not allowed on internal files in Fortran 95
(9.2.2.2(2), [138:3-4]) but I see that this restriction is removed in
Fortran 2003 (9.3(9), [178:15-16]).

    Also the restriction to only sequential access on internal files and
the requirement that internal files be opened implicitly means that
there is no way to specify a record length; RECL= is not an option with
the READ or WRITE statements.  In both standards, there is a
restriction, "The number of characters written shall not exceed the
length of the record", but this is a restriction on the program and the
standards are silent on what happens if the record length is exceeded.

    Can anyone suggest reasons why the standard prohibits direct access
on internal files?  From an I/O standp[oint, it appears to me that a
character array of 1000 elements is very much the same thing as a disk
file with 1000 records.

    Similarly, can anyone suggest reasons why the standard prohibits
unformatted I/O on internal files?  From an application developer's
perspective, it appears that this would be a great way to stuff
character variables and array elements with binary data.

--
----------
Sincerely,
Craig T. Dedo
17130 W. Burleigh Place             Internet:     [log in to unmask]
Brookfield, WI   53005-2759         Voice Phone:  (262) 783-5869
USA                                 Fax Phone:    (262) 783-5928

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
    safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."  -- Benjamin Franklin
    (1759)


Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2023
February 2023
November 2022
September 2022
February 2022
January 2022
June 2021
November 2020
September 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
December 2019
October 2019
September 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
April 2015
March 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
August 2014
July 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager