I vote for extending the syntax of the "thing-o." :-) It would make things a
lot more flexible.
Alvaro
OTOH, we could extend the syntax of the kind thing-o in a literal to allow
initialization expressions instead of names. One could then write something
such as 0.1_real_kinds(1) to get default real and 0.1_real_kinds(2) to get
double precision.
--
Van Snyder | What fraction of Americans believe
[log in to unmask] | Wrestling is real and NASA is fake?
Any alleged opinions are my own and have not been approved or disapproved
by JPL, CalTech, NASA, Sean O'Keefe, George Bush, the Pope, or anybody else.
|