--On Tuesday, March 9, 2004 10:11 AM +0000 John Reid <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> This is a tricky one that may call for an interpretation.
I see that you and Malcolm later settled on an answer to this particular
case, but also be aware that there already *IS* an interpretation in
this general area (using implied DO indices in initialization
expressions). I'd have to go search to find it, and my time sense
gets confused enough that I couldn't swear whether it was an f90
interp (and thus incorporated in f95) or an f95 one. I just recall
it being discussed.
|