the point is trevor that cris was right and I am redeemed
L
-----Original Message-----
From: Trevor Joyce <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 12 June 2004 20:10
Subject: Re: city on the hill
>Lawrence:
>
>And the point is?
>
>
>Trevor
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: cris cheek <[log in to unmask]>
>>To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
>>Date: 12 June 2004 18:58
>>Subject: Re: city on the hill
>>
>>Yes, Tim
>>
>>I have to support cris here
>>
>>I accused Richard of "race hatred and rambling self-loathing and personal
>>abuse"
>>
>>(and then I got muddled. I'm not sure if I was accusing Richard of
>>defecating in the list or exposing himself)
>>
>>As you can see I only said
>>
>>"race hatred and rambling self-loathing and personal abuse"
>>
>>so there was nothing cris could do about personal abuse even if he had
>>wanted to because all I had complained about was
>>
>>"race hatred and rambling self-loathing and personal abuse"
>>
>>and then I tried to clarify
>>
>>but all I said was ""the last time Mr Dillon made a personal attack, you
>>said - i do not quote
>>exactly - that they would not be tolerated further. he has now made
another.
>>what is the point of saying behaviour won't be tolerated if you are going
to
>>recommend toleration when it is repeated?"
>>
>>you see? racism, racism, racism, nothing about personal attacks
>>
>> His more recent post was claimed to be
>>>racist; that was Lawrence's charge.
>>
>>anyway, not to worry; I am sure we can all get a poem out of it; that's
the
>>main thing. Let the exchange of views continue!
>>
>>
>>L
>
>
>--
>------------------------------------------------------
>http://www.soundeye.org/trevorjoyce
>
|