JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ALLSTAT Archives


ALLSTAT Archives

ALLSTAT Archives


allstat@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ALLSTAT Home

ALLSTAT Home

ALLSTAT  2004

ALLSTAT 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Job:PhD studentship in statistical epidemiology

From:

Andrew McMullan <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Andrew McMullan <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:15:07 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (145 lines)

I have been asked to forward this to the list.
Please reply to the details given and not to me.


We are inviting applications for a PhD studentship in statistical
epidemiology, funded by GlaxoSmithKline for 3 years, starting at a mutually
convenient date. The studentship is open to EU citizens and covers
tuition fees and a generous living allowance.



The project concerns statistical methods in pharmacoepidemiology, using
large primary care data bases, such as the General Practice Research
Database, as described in the project outline below. The project
supervisor is James Carpenter, and the successful candidate will be
collaborating with statisticians and epidemiologists at both LSHTM and GSK
to develop a stimulating doctoral program of research.



Applicants must have an MSc (or equivalent) in statistics. Some knowledge
of epidemiology is desirable but not essential: an aptitude for applied
methodological research in statistics is more important.



Applications, including a CV and the names of two referees, should be sent
to Dr James Carpenter, Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene
and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT (email
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]), from whom
further particulars can be obtained. For an informal discussion telephone
James (020 7927 2033) or Professor Stuart Pocock (020 7927 2413). The
closing date for applications is Friday 20 August 2004.



Project outline: Statistical methods in pharmaco-epidemiology using large
general practice databases



This project concerns design issues and statistical methods in
pharmaco-epidemiology, i.e. the study of the use and effects of drug
treatment in populations, both as regards effectiveness and safety.
Although this can be viewed as an application of epidemiologic methods to
pharmaceuticals, the nature of the large routinely collected databases,
which typically form the principal source of information, mean that this
field poses challenges that often require special solutions in both study
design and statistical analysis. Further, the complex and dynamic context
of pharmaco-epidemiology gives rise to fascinating and unique statistical
challenges. Such challenges need to be addressed if the information in such
databases is to be reliably and routinely used.



For instance, for any particular class of drugs (e.g. statins for reducing
risk of coronary disease) it would be appropriate to investigate possible
associations with several other diseases (e.g. Alzheimer's disease, eye
cataract, suicide etc). The case-cohort design seems well suited to such
problems by making use of all disease cases together with a random
sub-sample of the whole cohort. Nested case-control studies for each
disease might be a suitable alternative approach.



The analysis of data from large routinely collected databases also presents
unique challenges. Propensity scores and weighting methods have been
proposed in other settings to reduce bias caused by non-random allocation
of treatments. However, their application to large scale database analyses
poses some special challenges, not least because of the considerable
quantity of missing observations, which are inevitable in a large amount of
routinely collected data. Subjects who have complete data on all exposures
and confounders are likely to be both unrepresentative and a relatively
small proportion of the total. Thus a conventional approach, such as using
only individuals with complete data, is likely to be both biased and
underpowered.



We intend to pursue a program of methodological research to address these
questions. In order to focus and enhance the practical relevance of this
research it will be closely linked to and illustrated by specific potential
drug-disease associations of interest to pharmaco-epidemiologists.



The precise sequence of methodological issues to be tackled will unfold
over time but specific potential topics of interest are as follows:



1. How do case-cohort and traditional case control designs compare, in
terms of efficiency and likely costs?

2. One problem with the case-cohort approach is the difficulty in
taking account of general practice effects since there is no matching of
cases to controls. How much does this apparent deficiency matter?

3. What size of sub-cohort should be selected and how one should
restrict its sampling frame to take account of the characteristics of
disease cases?

4. It has been suggested that repeat use of the same sub-cohort for
multiple disease-drug inferences may have some statistical penalty re
non-independence;

5. The use of nested case control studies has the inefficiency of
needing a separate selection of matched controls for each set of disease
cases. However, one can easily match on practice and then the statistical
analysis methods are better established. It will be valuable to compare
results (and the effort to produce them) for nested case-control and
case-cohort design for the same drug-disease questions;

6. Development of methods for coping with missing data in the
analysis, including the use of propensity scores and related approaches
when data are missing. This would involve the exploration and development
of multiple imputation methods that take into account (i) information on
the distribution of exposures and confounders available in the wider
epidemiological literature, and (ii) the hierarchical structure of the data
(with patients nested in practices etc).

7. Given the novel approaches required, the development of appropriate
statistical software and experience in handling such large databases will
be useful for future applications.



Our methodological findings, backed up by experience in real-world
pharmaco-epidemiological questions should have a major impact on how best
to make use of such large databases as the GRPD for studying drug safety
and effectiveness in a primary care setting.



Stuart Pocock
Medical Statistics Unit
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Keppel Street
London WC1E 7HT

Tel +44 (0)20 7927 2413 (direct)
                                2230 (secretary)

Fax +44 (0)20 7637 2853

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager