Dear All
I have been off-line for a long time, so if you're waiting for a reply from
me then please re-send
Thanks
JOHN BIBBY
PS: Also away 19 June - 19 July.
NB: My regular email address (1) has been up-and-down for the last few
months. Please re-send any appropriate items. Please also copy to my wife's
email address (2), which I am using temporarily. Thanks!
(1) [log in to unmask]
(2) [log in to unmask]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A UK-based worldwide e-mail broadcast system mailing list
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Noori Akhtar-Danesh
> Sent: 07 June 2004 21:06
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Coefficient of variation
>
>
> Dear folks,
>
> I have received a comment from a reviewer for a submitted manuscript that:
>
> "If CV (coefficient of variation) is > 33.3, the results should
> not be included in any reporting. If CV is between 16.6 and
> 33.3, you should add a caution to the results such as: interpret
> with caution as CV is between 16.6 and 33.3."
>
> Is there any concrete reference to support this statement in general?
>
> Many thanks for your help,
>
> Noori
>
> ============================
> Noori Akhtar-Danesh,
> Statistician, PhD
> Faculty of Health Sciences,
> Room 3N28B
> McMaster University,
> 1200 Main St. West,
> Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5,
> CANADA
> =============================
>
|