Our Table 3 data is particularly worrying as whilst some of the drop-
out figures appear credible ie the first years, the figures for all
years, particularly PGT, seem very high. Is anybody else
experiencing the same?
The figures in Table 1, both raw and rounded are just plain wrong!
Ros
Date sent: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 15:47:50 +0100
Send reply to: "Academic, financial or space planning in UK universities" <[log in to unmask]>
From: Wendy Laver <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Reconciling TQI Continuation Data to local Stats
To: [log in to unmask]
We have spent the last few days trying to reconcile the tables with
local statistics and are having particular problems trying to match
the numbers in Table 1, which don't seem to match our figures at
all.
Any help or clarification would be much appreciated.
Wendy Laver
Planning Officer
Lincoln University
-----Original Message-----
From: Academic, financial or space planning in UK universities
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Colin Curwen
Sent: 08 July 2004 15:02
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Reconciling TQI Continutation Data to local Stats
Is anybody else having difficulty reconciling the recently sent out
TQI continuation data with local statistics?
Any ideas, solutions?
Colin Curwen - Senior Officer, Planning Support
Leeds Metropolitan University
[log in to unmask]
Planning Officer
The University of Manchester
Policy and Planning Unit
John Owens Building, Oxford Road
Manchester M13 9PL Tel: 0161 275 2447
|