>>> [log in to unmask] 06/15/04 06:46pm >>>
In a message dated 6/15/2004 10:57:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [log in to unmask]
writes:
> With a congenitally long 2nd met or a short 1st, why use a 1st met cut out
> as the article suggests? This will reduce ground reaction force under the
> 1st and increase it sub second.
Jeff,
For what its worth, my experience with F-scan has repeatedly shown that a 1st
ray c/o will INCREASE the load sub 1st, while simultaneously reducing load
sub 2nd. I know this is contrary to classic ideology, but I have measured this
effect countless times.
Regards,
Howard
Howard Dananberg, DPM
21 Eastman Avenue
Bedford, New Hampshire 03110
603-625-5772
fax 603-625-9889
[log in to unmask]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server
All opinions and assertions contained in this message are those of
the original author. The listowner(s) and the JISCmail service take
no responsibility for the content.
to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
leave podiatry
to [log in to unmask]
Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server
All opinions and assertions contained in this message are those of
the original author. The listowner(s) and the JISCmail service take
no responsibility for the content.
to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
leave podiatry
to [log in to unmask]
Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|