Having been expelled from the Society, it could be argued that I have an axe
to grind BUT it seems extraordinary to claim that only 350 members need to
be surveyed to get an accuracy of +/- 5% and then to survey 2000. Could it
be that 1,650 members can be statistically expected to bin their document;
or, perish the thought, the ''random" sample might not be so random after
all?
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Spooner" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: Ignore if you are not a member of SOCAP
> All,
>
> I have received a response from SOCAP re the survey:
>
> "This survey of the membership is something that the Society carries out
> every few years to ascertain the views of members on the services that the
> Society offers.
>
> As with any market research, we only used a sample of the membership, 2000
> to be exact, ensuring that we covered the whole of the UK geographically.
> The reason that we did not survey the whole membership is that
> statistically, you only need to survey 350 people to ensure an accuracy of
> response of +/- 5%.
>
> Therefore we know that all the information we get back represents the
views
> of around 95% of the membership.
>
> Therefore, it is not only time consuming to survey the whole membership,
but
> also very costly with very little advantage.
>
> Obviously, there may be people who were not part of the survey that wished
> to make their views known, but there is no reason members cannot write to
us
> separately if they have a particular view.
>
> I hope this answers your question. "
>
> I will be asking questions around sampling strategy etc. and how they
> arrived at those figures above because we all know that 75% of stats are
> made up on the spot ;-) Anybody know about power analysis for
questionnaire
> based research- closed questions and rank answered questions? What is the
> total membership of SOCAP?
>
> Best wishes,
> Simon
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server
>
> All opinions and assertions contained in this message are those of
> the original author. The listowner(s) and the JISCmail service take
> no responsibility for the content.
>
> to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
> leave podiatry
> to [log in to unmask]
>
> Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server
All opinions and assertions contained in this message are those of
the original author. The listowner(s) and the JISCmail service take
no responsibility for the content.
to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
leave podiatry
to [log in to unmask]
Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|