JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY Archives

PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY  2004

PODIATRY 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Post New Message

Post New Message

Newsletter Templates

Newsletter Templates

Log Out

Log Out

Change Password

Change Password

Subject:

Re: Orthotics and the force required to dorsiflex the hallux

From:

Jeff Root <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A group for the academic discussion of current issues in podiatry <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:45:00 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (48 lines)

Reply

Reply

Simon, you asked Craig:
>Given that you did not see significant change in rearfoot position in your
study, can you postulate on how the orthotics might have produced the
reduction in force required for dorsiflexion.<

The frontal plane position and the direction of motion of the posterior
surface of the calcaneus are only one indicator of the position or direction
of motion of the STJ.  Although more difficult to observe or measure without
x-ray, the transverse and sagittal plane position of the talus is also an
indicator of STJ position.  When you dorsiflex the hallux during the
Hubschere maneuver the arch height increases.  How does arch height
increase?  Probably a combination of closed chain MTJ supination and STJ
supination.  This requires talar dorsiflexion and abduction or forefoot
adduction and plantarflexion.

To some degree, an orthosis supports the medial arch of the foot, thereby
reducing the extent of adduction and plantarflexion of the talar head during
relaxed stance.  When wearing an orthosis the medial arch of the orthosis is
under load.  The higher the arch of the orthosis, the greater the supination
moment created by the device.  This is obvious if you imagine a highly
exaggerated arch shape within an orthosis (forefoot plantarflexes and
rearfoot inverts-not necessarily comfortably though).

So one question is, how much of the force need to dorsiflex the hallux is
necessary to supinate the MTJ in a closed chain condition?  Can we really
differentiate STJ and MTJ motion or the forces necessary to produce motion
in a closed chain situation?  Perhaps the orthosis reduces the force
necessary to dorsiflex the hallux because it influences the position of
and/or moments at the MTJ!

Respectfully,

Jeff Root

-----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server

All opinions and assertions contained in this message are those of
the original author. The listowner(s) and the JISCmail service take
no responsibility for the content.

to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
leave podiatry
to [log in to unmask]

Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2023
March 2023
April 2021
February 2020
January 2019
June 2018
May 2018
February 2018
August 2017
March 2017
November 2016
April 2016
January 2016
March 2015
November 2014
April 2014
January 2014
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
October 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager