JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY Archives

PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY  2004

PODIATRY 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Post New Message

Post New Message

Newsletter Templates

Newsletter Templates

Log Out

Log Out

Change Password

Change Password

Subject:

Re: F-Scan protocols

From:

Norman Murphy <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A group for the academic discussion of current issues in podiatry <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:26:34 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (91 lines)

Reply

Reply

Hi Philip,

I have been (and continuing) to traveling for the next week. If you have any specific questions regarding your protocol (set-up for data analysis) let me know.
Regarding your question:

I am hoping to show a differnce between the pressures seen in the foot in
relation to material contruction e.g. high density material at the
posterior/medial aspect of the orthoses to resist initial foot contact GRF
at the heel.

Is this then relevant to further orthoses presription? I am hoping to
prove that it is.

It does become relevant if the desired treatment outcome is for example, reduce time the heel (left only, right only, or both) is in contact (speed up heel or rearfoot lift), or increase time heel is in contact (slow down heel lift). In other words, trying to synchronize contact time between the left and the right heel (rearfoot) during contact phase (also referred to heel pivot). The opposite also holds true, the desired treatment outcome can be to have one heel spend less/more time in contact. It all depends on what the desired outcome (prescription) is to be.
 
Two items to take into consideration which both will affect pressure, force curve and CoF.
1) density of material, and/or
2) thickness of material.

To reduce torque (rotational/translational force) at the knee, and especially at the hip, ideally it is mechanically more efficient (and less damaging over time (5-10-20-40 years down the road) to have similar integrals (force-time relationship) during heel contact (heel pivot) between the left foot and right foot. Additionally, it is also mechanically more efficient if the integral during mid-stance (ankle pivot) are similar between left and right feet. The same applies during push-off (forefoot pivot).

Force-time is controllable for the foot with material density and thickness at heel, at mid-foot and at forefoot compartments.

Material density and thickness at heel also affect ROM the calcaneous will travel (rotate, translate) about the subtalar axis. Material density and thickness also affect ROM the subtalar axis will displace. The subtalar axis is not fixed, but instantaneous, and the amount of pro-supination about the rearfoot can affect its displacement, and the respective motion of the calcaneous about the axis. This affects the torque being generated about the knee and hip. The same applies for the mid-foot and forefoot, with both also affect the torque generated about the knee and hip.

In addition, force-time is dependant on how compliant the compartments (rearfoot, mid-foot, forefoot) of the feet are to the affect of material density and thickness.

In research, you can set the hypothesis you wish. Your data analysis (and results) needs to be such that it will either accept or reject your hypothesis. A hypothesis is based on an assumption (with viable justification) that one wants/wishes to answer, verify, confirm/deny.

Not to discredit orthotic intervention/treatment (foot problems and gait related disorders),  research on orthotic intervention (effects of) based on a viable hypothesis will advance the body of knowledge. Speaking of cause and experience, orthotic intervention has allowed me to become pain free at ankle, forefoot (5th met-head) and low back. Prior to intervention, I was a basket-case, so to speak.

I need to get ready to travel. I will send you a subsequent e-mail regarding your subject groups and intervention. I have ready too many research papers on orthotics where the intervention was not applicable and or inappropriate for the subject(s), and therefore outcomes were masked, resulting in no effect or unfavorable to prescription orthotics.

Bart, Bob
Have not forgotten you both regarding CoM.

Cheers,

Norman

-----Original Message-----
From: A group for the academic discussion of current issues in podiatry
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Philip Wells
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 8:34 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: F-Scan protocols


Thanks for the info eveyone.
The one comment I have to Bart is when doing research such as this, does
the orthoses have to be necessarily applicable to a client group.
I am hoping to show a differnce between the pressures seen in the foot in
relation to material contruction e.g. high density material at the
posterior/medial aspect of the orthoses to resist initial foot contact GRF
at the heel.

Is this then relevant to further orthoses presription? I am hoping to
prove that it is.

Thanks

Phil

-----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server

All opinions and assertions contained in this message are those of
the original author. The listowner(s) and the JISCmail service take
no responsibility for the content.

to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
leave podiatry
to [log in to unmask]

Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
-----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server

All opinions and assertions contained in this message are those of
the original author. The listowner(s) and the JISCmail service take
no responsibility for the content.

to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
leave podiatry
to [log in to unmask]

Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2023
March 2023
April 2021
February 2020
January 2019
June 2018
May 2018
February 2018
August 2017
March 2017
November 2016
April 2016
January 2016
March 2015
November 2014
April 2014
January 2014
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
October 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager