JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY Archives

PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY  2004

PODIATRY 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Post New Message

Post New Message

Newsletter Templates

Newsletter Templates

Log Out

Log Out

Change Password

Change Password

Subject:

Re: Measuring toe flexion strength

From:

Bruce Williams <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A group for the academic discussion of current issues in podiatry <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 28 Nov 2004 12:02:20 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (157 lines)

Reply

Reply

Kevin and Stan;
    I'd like to interject something into this conversation if I may.  I"m
seeing the value of both of your arguments, and somehthing missing as well.
    I would tend to agree that metatarsal spread contributes to neuroma
pain, but usually only if the patient wears a constrictive shoe of some
sort.
    I think it is more of a stability issue over time, than just a
metatarsal spread issue.  Just as I think that plantar fascitis is a force
vs. time problem, I think that if the foot moves or rolls as it should thru
the sagittal plane with little or no restrictions, i.e. metarsal spread,
dorsiflesion of the FF on the RF, etc., then you will have very little
chance of developing a neuroma.
    Also, re: plantarflexion of the metatarsals, moments or otherwise, and
development of hammertoes.  I very regularly see patients with FnHL
(functional hallux limitus) w/ contracted digits 2-5, or some combination
2-5.  I have generally felt that these patients grip with their toes to
maintain stability lost by the FnHL at the 1st mpj.  I've sucessfully
treated several athletes w/ isolated DIPJ or PIPJ pain 2-5 by using a
modified low dye, and then if that works, putting them into a CFO with a 1st
ray cutout.  It seems that they do not have to grip to the same level
anymore and this relieves the pain completely.
    I'd like to think that this is a primary contribution towards hammertoes
and metatarsalgia and neuroma as well.
    Consider too, that the dorsiflexion of the lateral column and the medial
column often causes severe metatarsalgia or neuromas in this region 2-4
mpj's.  Again it seems that loss of stability due to a combination of
pathologies (FnHL, medital STJ position, and MTJ pronation) can cause this
"inverted" forefoot deformity, as I've been calling it.  What I"m saying is
that the 1st and 5th rays are dorsiflexed in respect to the rays 2-4, and
that often the 3rd ray will take the brunt of this force.  I often see pain
on palpation of the plantar base of teh 3rd met and lateral cuneiform in
these patients.  Those with more stable MTJ's tend not to have as much or
any tenderness in that area.
    This idea of mine, with ample credit to Kevin Miller and others!, seems
to correlate well with Drs. Nester, Cocheba and Ward have discovered with
their dead man experiment.  They have shown that on average the 4th and 5th
mets move as a unit, as does the medial column made up of the mets 1-3 and
the cuneiforms 1-3.  It would make sense to me that, as Jeff Root said
recently in anothe post, the other bones of the foot can has obious effects
on the STJ position and MTJ as well.
    Just a thought! ;-)
Happy Holidays!
Bruce Williams

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr. Stanley Beekman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 1:46 AM
Subject: Re: Measuring toe flexion strength


> Kevin,
>
>
> The motion occurs at Lis Franc's joint, The metatarsal will plantarflex
> with motion toward the 3rd metatarsal (and dorsiflexion with motion away
> from the third metatarsal). So plantarflexion will bring the metatarsals
> together.
>
> So in your scenario, the flexors plantarflex the forefoot (metatarsals),
> this would cause the metatarsal heads to squeeze together.
>
> In another scenario, the 3 groups of digital musculature are eccentrically
> firing utilizing the body's momentum. The effect of this is to control the
> plantarflexion of the metatarsal heads from the windlass effect, so the
> metatarsal heads do not impinge on the intermetatarsal nerves.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Stanley
>
> At 11:04 PM 11/27/04 -0800, you wrote:
> >Stanley and Colleagues:
> >
> >Stanley wrote:
> >
> ><<Thank you for the explanation. Now I think I understand what you are
> >saying.
> >Just clear up one more thing for me and I am with you.
> >It is commonly thought that one of the causes of Morton's neuroma is the
> >weakness of the digital flexors. It is felt that the weakness results in
> >the metatarsal heads dropping and squeezing the intermetatarsal nerve.
The
> >treatment is to use a metatarsal pad to lift and separate the metatarsal
> >heads. How does this fit into your theory of the muscles causing forefoot
> >plantarflexion?>>
> >
> >I don't know if digital flexor weakness is or is not a cause of Morton's
> >neuroma.  I have always thought that a metatarsal pad will tend to
> >decrease the pressure on the neuroma by separating the metatarsals away
> >from the neuroma.  I don't know if this is readily explained by sagittal
> >plane kinetics of the midtarsal joint.  Possibly a transverse plane
> >kinetic analysis of the metatarsal-cuneiform and metatarsal-cuboid joints
> >would be more fruitful in giving an answer as to the etiology and
> >treatment of Morton's neuroma.
> >
> >Sincerely,
> >
> >Kevin
> >
>
>***************************************************************************
*
> >Kevin A. Kirby, DPM
> >Adjunct Associate Professor
> >Department of Applied Biomechanics
> >California School of Podiatric Medicine at Samuel Merritt College
> >
> >Private Practice:
> >107 Scripps Drive, Suite 200
> >Sacramento, CA  95825  USA
> >
> >Voice:  (916) 925-8111     Fax:  (916) 925-8136
>
>***************************************************************************
> >----------------------------------------------------------------- This
> >message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server
> >
> >All opinions and assertions contained in this message are those of the
> >original author. The listowner(s) and the JISCmail service take no
> >responsibility for the content.
> >
> >to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text leave
> >podiatry to [log in to unmask]
> >
> >Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
> >-----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server
>
> All opinions and assertions contained in this message are those of
> the original author. The listowner(s) and the JISCmail service take
> no responsibility for the content.
>
> to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
> leave podiatry
> to [log in to unmask]
>
> Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>

-----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was distributed by the Podiatry JISCmail list server

All opinions and assertions contained in this message are those of
the original author. The listowner(s) and the JISCmail service take
no responsibility for the content.

to leave the Podiatry email list send a message containing the text
leave podiatry
to [log in to unmask]

Please visit http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk for any further information
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2023
March 2023
April 2021
February 2020
January 2019
June 2018
May 2018
February 2018
August 2017
March 2017
November 2016
April 2016
January 2016
March 2015
November 2014
April 2014
January 2014
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
October 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager