Lawrence:
And the point is?
Trevor
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cris cheek <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: 12 June 2004 18:58
>Subject: Re: city on the hill
>
>Yes, Tim
>
>I have to support cris here
>
>I accused Richard of "race hatred and rambling self-loathing and personal
>abuse"
>
>(and then I got muddled. I'm not sure if I was accusing Richard of
>defecating in the list or exposing himself)
>
>As you can see I only said
>
>"race hatred and rambling self-loathing and personal abuse"
>
>so there was nothing cris could do about personal abuse even if he had
>wanted to because all I had complained about was
>
>"race hatred and rambling self-loathing and personal abuse"
>
>and then I tried to clarify
>
>but all I said was ""the last time Mr Dillon made a personal attack, you
>said - i do not quote
>exactly - that they would not be tolerated further. he has now made another.
>what is the point of saying behaviour won't be tolerated if you are going to
>recommend toleration when it is repeated?"
>
>you see? racism, racism, racism, nothing about personal attacks
>
> His more recent post was claimed to be
>>racist; that was Lawrence's charge.
>
>anyway, not to worry; I am sure we can all get a poem out of it; that's the
>main thing. Let the exchange of views continue!
>
>
>L
--
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.soundeye.org/trevorjoyce
|