-----Original Message-----
From: cris cheek <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 12 June 2004 18:58
Subject: Re: city on the hill
Yes, Tim
I have to support cris here
I accused Richard of "race hatred and rambling self-loathing and personal
abuse"
(and then I got muddled. I'm not sure if I was accusing Richard of
defecating in the list or exposing himself)
As you can see I only said
"race hatred and rambling self-loathing and personal abuse"
so there was nothing cris could do about personal abuse even if he had
wanted to because all I had complained about was
"race hatred and rambling self-loathing and personal abuse"
and then I tried to clarify
but all I said was ""the last time Mr Dillon made a personal attack, you
said - i do not quote
exactly - that they would not be tolerated further. he has now made another.
what is the point of saying behaviour won't be tolerated if you are going to
recommend toleration when it is repeated?"
you see? racism, racism, racism, nothing about personal attacks
His more recent post was claimed to be
>racist; that was Lawrence's charge.
anyway, not to worry; I am sure we can all get a poem out of it; that's the
main thing. Let the exchange of views continue!
L
|