Ron Silliman:
Consider the war ideology (sic) of the modern Democrat Party. They
want Bush to prosecute the Ghoul Terrorists of IslamoFascism under
the constraints of ACLU twit absurdist Utopians like Attn: Michael
Kresser. (Consider the Jamie Gorelick "Wall" of the 1995 Memo that
prevented investigators from gathering the data needed to capture the
Captain Hook, One-Eyed El Masri.)
In order to complete the conundrum, it is only to be seen that this
state of mental self contradiction and legal paralysis has been
purposely induced from outside the American culture. See: The
Anarcho-Socialism of Grasci and the other fellow travellers of the
Frankfurt School.
It is at this place I took my leave of the Naropoids and the St. Marxists.
By sending me this article it seems to me that you have come to a
place in your deep cogitations that will lead you, also, to the
daylight beyond the cave. (Unless you AGREE with the ACLU!)
Come out. Throw off the erstaz Utopian trance of Marcuse and Alinsky
(Hillary's teacher.) Join Rush Limbaugh and myself in the light of
common sense and Americanism.
R I C H A R D D I L L O N
>Calif. court considers whether violent poetry is criminal
>- DAVID KRAVETS, Associated Press Writer
>Friday, May 28, 2004
>
>(05-28) 03:16 PDT SAN FRANCISCO (AP) --
>
>The California Supreme Court is deciding whether to throw out the
>conviction of a 15-year-old boy who served 100 days in juvenile hall for
>writing a poem that included a threat to kill his fellow students.
>
>The case weighs free speech rights against the government's
>responsibility to provide safety in schools after campus shootings
>nationwide.
>
>Attorneys for the San Jose boy, identified as George T. in court
>records, described the poem Thursday as youthful artistic expression.
>One passage says: "For I can be the next kid to bring guns to kill
>students at school." Another reads: "For I am Dark, Destructive &
>Dangerous."
>
>"This is a classic case of a person expressing himself and trying to
>communicate his feelings through a poem," attorney Michael Kresser told
>the court, which gave no clear indication what it would do. A ruling is
>expected within 90 days.
>
--
|