I have not really been following this issue but was myself thinking - do we
have to wait to be asked? We represent around 25,000 information workers, so
our voice should be heard. Perhaps we should have a watching brief on areas
that relate to our field. If we don't already that is!
Jackie Fishleigh
Librarian
Payne Hicks Beach
10 New Square
Lincoln's Inn
London
WC2A 3QG
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Oppenheim [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 02 February 2004 10:14
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Select Committee Inquiry into Scientific Publications - CILIP
Submission
Sorry to be a pain, but this was an open invitation to anyone to contribute
(as I did some weeks ago) and CILIP should have been working on it already.
But I'm glad CILIP is on the case now.
Charles
Professor Charles Oppenheim
Department of Information Science
Loughborough University
Loughborough
Leics LE11 3TU
01509-223065
(fax) 01509-223053
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kathy Ennis" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 9:51 AM
Subject: Select Committee Inquiry into Scientific Publications - CILIP
Submission
Dear List Members,
This is to confirm to the list that CILIP has - very late in the day - been
asked to supply evidence to the Select Committee Inquiry into Scientific
Publications. Evidence has to be submitted by 12th February.
I would appreciate it if you would send any comments / evidence /
information to me at [log in to unmask] by Friday 6th February.
Thank you for your assistance.
Kathy Ennis
Post-16 Learning Adviser
tel: 020 7255 0500
email: [log in to unmask]
Are you getting the most out of your CILIP membership?
There's more to membership than you think.
For full details of CILIP and its services to members, visit
http://www.cilip.org.uk
|