Dr G Balin wrote:
> Doesn't this make the case for limited companies all the more
> compelling? Is there anything that would stop my _company_ from
> charging the punter but still leave me free of blame? At present I do
> this for the nursing home retainer [original thread- remember ;-) ]
> and all private work - insurance reports, hgv's etc. If I wanted to
> do a vasectomy, say, would I still be able to via the nGMS?
The functions described earlier in the thread do not amount to "treatment"
Andy
|