In message <000001c3faf5$724434f0$0afea8c0@mark1ux7h9fojd>, Mark Trowell
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>Have you seen:
>
>http://www.doh.gov.uk/gmscontract/annex_a_disease_prevalence.pdf
I got a slightly confusing website - where did you want me to look?
Was it:-
http://www.publications.doh.gov.uk/cmo/qualitycare/index.htm ?
Your link delivered me to:-
http://www.dh.gov.uk/Home/fs/en .. with no relevance to anything, as far
as I could tell!
Mary
>
>
>Mark
>
>Mark Trowell
>GP Highbridge Medical Centre
>Chair Primary Care Systems Project Group
>ICT Clinical Lead and PEC Somerset Coast PCT
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: GP-UK [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Trefor Roscoe
>Sent: 15 February 2004 23:26
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: National Prevalence
>
>Mary Hawking wrote:
>> Doesn't this assume that the paper record is accurate?
>> Unless you are compulsive, , isn't it as likely (or even more likely)
>> that information will be held in the EPR rather than on paper?
>>
>
>Agreed this is really an argument without a baseline
>
>There are no absolutes at the moment
>
>Trefor
--
Mary Hawking
|