In message <[log in to unmask]>, Michael
Leuty <[log in to unmask]> writes
>On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 20:35, Trefor Roscoe wrote:
>> Note the final budgets bit, your all signing contracts that will not be
>> clearly funded till after you start.
>> The GPC seems to think this is reasonable.
>
>It's alright Tref, we don't actually have to vote to accept the contract
>until it has been fully priced.
Just keep an eye on the rest of the contract you're signing!
472, 474 and 474 have been withdrawn.. But has anyone seen any general
warning to practices about this?
MaryH
>--
>Michael Leuty <[log in to unmask]>
--
Mary Hawking
|