Dai Evans <mailto:[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Interestingly when the question was put at the NUG conference, 50% of
> those present (ok a specialised subset), said they would be happy to
> pay for it. When you do the sums....
> increased rewards from nGMS = £20k
> choice of system that doesnt allow targets to be met (lose £20k) or
> pay £2k for system that does allow targets to be met - tax deductable
>
> My case rests
Dai
I am one of the camp that might pay for it... But it does depend on whether
Mr Granger would let us play with his ICRS data spine. Interesting to see
whether the interface will be published and freely available or whether it
is a closed shop. If the latter...
--
Tim Walter
http://www.falklandsurgery.co.uk
|