Laurie Miles wrote:
>Does anyone know if there are nationwide problems with the above systems and
>QMAS/QOF data?
>
>Our local practices are getting inconsistent and what appear to be wrong
>results, and are understandably worried about whether the problems are being
>addressed/fixed.
>
>Unfortunately, although the Torex helpline improved enormously a few months
>ago, there seems to have been some deterioration again. The response the
>practices are currently getting is that Torex are "looking into it".
>Informatics in our area is therefore unsure whether this is a local
>configuration problem, a training issue (unlikely with the IT expertise of
>some of the practices) or software or even hardware faults.
>
>Any information from elsewhere in the country would be gratefully received.
>One practice is even talking about needing to prepare for a paper QOF
>submission.
>
>Dr Laurie Miles
>IT and Medicines Management Lead GP, St Helens PCT
>
>
>***************************************************************************
>This e-mail is confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended
>recipent please accept our apologies; please do not disclose, copy or
>distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its
>contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please
>inform us that this message has gone astray before deleting it. Thank you
>for your co-operation.
>***************************************************************************
>
>
>
Yes, the results are inconcistent. We are relying on Contract Plus from
Front Desk which seems much more reliable and gives useful results.
(Only 64 points to go).
Allan Harris
|