David Rayne wrote:
> After two days it is still good. None of 300 or so spam per
> day stayed in the Inbox. A dozen or so went to the "Suspected
> Junk" folder and were easily sorted and automatically
> trained. Other than those there have been no false positives or
> negatives.
>
> Unlike some other spam checkers it doesn't make me use
> someone else's server for my incoming emails or have a
> community of people decide what is spam for me.
>
> I like it.
>
> Thank you Brian.
>
>
> DR
I've been using it for a couple of months, and it hasn't made a single
"mistake". My system was being seriously slowed down by iHateSpam, and
SpamBayes seems to have very little impact on performance.
Michael
|