"The practice should observe freedom of information regulations"?
Adrian Midgley wrote:
> On Monday 29 March 2004 09:36, Simon Child wrote:
>
>
>>440. The Contractor shall not be required to comply with any request made
>>in accordance with clause 439 unless it has been made by the PCT in
>>accordance with directions relating to the provision of information by
>>contractors given to the PCT under section 17 of the Act.
>>
>>Requests for information from PCT Patients’ Forums
>>
>>441. Subject to clause 441, if the Contractor receives a written request
>
> ----------- ----- presumably 440
>
> What I have not seen here is an alternative clause or phrasing...
>
> I do not think it would be easy to negotiate or enforce one that said "The
> contractor need provide no information to anyone for any reason" and various
> of our colleagues have demanded that everything be set down plainly, so there
> is presumably going to have to be some specification of what sort of
> information must be provided and to whom.
>
> I'd find it at least very hard to write a better phrased clause.
>
|