Hi - they should correspond in general - if you look at a first-level
analysis and look at the non-Talairach-space version of the cluster table,
the voxel positions should correspond to the voxel positions shown in
FSLView. Does this work for you? The only minor issue might be that
FSLView is about half a voxel out when showing standard-space images and
reporting mm co-ordinates - that'll get fixed in the next version.
Cheers, Steve.
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, lucina wrote:
> Hi, I have a question about FSL view: In trying to locate the peak
> voxels, I used the local maxima table that you can find in the
> report.html for each contrast. However, it seems that the coordinates
> listed there don't match up with the actual peaks I can see in FSL
> view. In other words, the coordinates listed in the tables don't
> correspond to the peak activations in FSL view. Any ideas? Thanks,
>
> Lucina
>
> --
> Lucina Q. Uddin
> UCLA Psychology-Cognitive Neuroscience
> Box 951563, B627 Franz Hall
> Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563
>
Stephen M. Smith DPhil
Associate Director, FMRIB and Analysis Research Coordinator
Oxford University Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain
John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
+44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
[log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
|