Neil and all,
If you look at my previous email you will see that it was simply an
expression of some scepticism and a request for information. Nothing
irresponsible in that I hope.
Sorry Neil for putting you on the spot, but as this is circulating no
doubt others will have received it too. Your response is very useful in
setting the record straight.
The issue of 'setting' is I think increasingly exercising us all.
John
--------------------------------------------------------
John Wood
Senior Archaeologist
Planning and Development Service
The Highland Council
Glenurquhart Road
Inverness IV3 5NX
Direct line 01463 702502
Web: http://www.higharch.demon.co.uk
This Email (and any attachment) is intended for the exclusive use of the
addressee(s) only. You should not disclose its contents to any other
person. If you receive this message in error, please contact the sender
and delete the message. Thank you
Opinions expressed herein are my own and do not necessarily represent
those of my employer.
-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Campling [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 01 September 2003 11:26
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: FW: online petition to save Thornborough Henges
Dear John and All
It is extremely irresponsible for another curator to promulgate these
kinds of "causes" without first checking with the local curator about
the accuracy of the case.
The Thornborough Henges are not under threat. They are a Scheduled
ancient Monument. The "sacred plateau", which is a construct of a few
local individual's imagination, is also not under threat. The idea of
lakes around the middle and southern henges is a "red herring" put
forward by one or two people who are opposed to wetland conservation and
shooting rights. There are currently no planning applications for, and
not even any discussions about, quarrying around the middle and southern
henges. The last quarrying permission was granted in 1994 and the
closest it comes to the northern henge is 330m. The quarry in which
landfill has occurred was worked in the 1960's, and the landfill
operation was granted some 20 years ago, and is a response to try and
get back to a more normal landscape (rather than a great open void).
The "Friends of Thornborough" web site is full of inaccuracies,
misrepresentations, and false assumptions. Many of the visualised "post
alignments" are figments of peoples' imaginations: the alignments either
don't exist or the pits show no evidence of posts. The "sacred plateau"
is composed of a series of monuments that were never used
contemporaneously, but over 1000-1500 years. The real issue is one of
"stand-off" distance, what is the setting of the henges and what
distance around them should be kept free from development. We have some
informal ideas, but no evidence to support any specific stand-off
distance in a court of law or public inquiry. At present there are
three or four research projects on-going which are looking at various
aspects of the archaeology and palaeo-environmentology of the area
trying to come up with a better understanding of the prehistory of the
area and a better idea of setting or sacred space for the monuments.
But in the meantime, there are no proposals for further quarrying or
landfill, and there is no threat to the monuments. Please do not
believe all you read on Internet web sites. This goes back a couple of
years to the FISH e-conference and my comments in response to Richard
Morris. We need to use our critical faculties more when it comes to
information technology.
If any of you wish to discuss the case in more detail or clarify any
points, then please contact me directly first on (01609) 532330 or
[log in to unmask] . Please do not sign the petition: it
only shows you've swallowed the misrepresentations of the web site hook
line & sinker.
Cheers,
Neil Campling
County Archaeologist
1 September 2003
>>> [log in to unmask] 01/09/2003 10:35:02 >>>
I have received the attached e-mail, and I must say it seems beyond
belief that there could really be extensive quarrying and landfill
proposals in such an important archaeological landscape.
Is this really correct, and if so what on earth has gone wrong?
John
--------------------------------------------------------
John Wood
Senior Archaeologist
Planning and Development Service
The Highland Council
Glenurquhart Road
Inverness IV3 5NX
Direct line 01463 702502
Web: http://www.higharch.demon.co.uk
This Email (and any attachment) is intended for the exclusive use of the
addressee(s) only. You should not disclose its contents to any other
person. If you receive this message in error, please contact the sender
and delete the message. Thank you
Opinions expressed herein are my own and do not necessarily represent
those of my employer.
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 13 May 2003 20:53
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: fw: Please help: sign online petition to save Thornborough
Henges
Please sign the petition below and please forward it on to EVERYONE,
ANYONE, ANYWHERE who might just possibly care.
http://www.petitiononline.com/pet10001
if you are unaware of the current proposals please visit the Friends of
Thornborough website at
http://www.friendsofthornborough.org\
Thank you for reading this.
WARNING
This E-mail and any attachments may contain information that is
confidential or privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
named recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken is
prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily the
view of the Council.
North Yorkshire County Council.
|