Robina, Ann,

> I agree. I had also noticed this clash. Robina beat me to
> pointing it out! I would think it very unwise to hold these 2
> working group meetings at the same time.
>
> There's also an inconsistency on the programme between the
> table, showing Collections WG at 15:30-17:30, and the more
> detailed programme farther down the page showing it at 13:00-
> 15:00. So I'm guessing it's already been moved once because
> of the paper clash?

I did notice the clash with the Libraries WG, but yes, you guessed
correctly: it was initially scheduled for 13.00 and I asked for  change
because of the conflict with Rachel's/my paper.

We've rather prevailed on Makx's/Stuart's goodwill already as I missed
the initial deadline and only asked for a session for this WG quite late
in the day so I fear it will be difficult to reschedule again, but we
are making some enquiries and I'll let you know the outcome.

> Anyway I hope to attend the Collections WG whenever it takes
> place (except Tues 15:30 - 17:30 which is my paper session).

Pete